Type de document : Research Paper
Auteur
Maître-assistant, Université internationale Imam Khomeini
Résumé
L’enseignement de la compréhension est un grand défi. Beaucoup d’enseignants de langue ont reçu peu ou pas de formation sur la façon d’enseigner la compréhension dans leurs cours. En conséquence, plusieurs éducateurs planifient leurs leçons de compréhension avec une connaissance pédagogique limitée (Block, Gambrell et Pressley, 2002). Les chercheurs ont démontré que la situation actuelle de l’enseignement de la compréhension en lecture dans les classes de langue ne s’est pas sensiblement améliorée au cours des 30 dernières années (Dewitz et al., 2010). Cette étude tente de répondre à la question de recherche suivante : comment et par quels outils pouvons-nous enseigner efficacement aux apprenants la compréhension en lecture? Plusieurs approches et stratégies spécifiques à l’enseignement de la compréhension en lecture en langue première et en langue étrangère ont émergé dans les recherches publiées au cours des 30 dernières années. Nous avons synthétisé les résultats de nombreux articles, des recherches expérimentales et rapports techniques ainsi que des méta-analyses effectuées après l’année 2000 pour relever et fournir une vue d’ensemble complète des approches et des stratégies d’enseignement les plus efficaces et les plus communes et de l’enseignement de la compréhension en langue première et en langue étrangère. Les résultats de cette recherche nous aident à voir comment les enseignants de langue peuvent enseigner la compréhension en lecture, ce qui serait une première étape vers l’adoption de nouvelles approches et de nouveaux outils dans les cours de langue.
Mots clés
ALDERSON John Charles, Assessing reading, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
ALEXANDER Patricia A. & FOX Emily, “A Historical Perspective on Reading Research and Practice”. In R. B. Rudell. & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 2004, pp. 33 - 69.
ALLINGTON Richard L,“What I’ve learned about effective classroom teaching from a decade of studying exemplary elementary school teachers”, Phi Delta Kappan, 2002, 83 (10), pp. 740-747.
ANDERSON Neil J., “Scrolling, clicking and reading English: Online reading strategies in second / foreign language.” Reading Matrix, 2003, 3 (3), pp.1-32.
ANDERSON Neil J., Exploring Second Language Reading: Issues and Strategies, Boston, Heinle & heinle, 1999.
ARMAND Françoise, « Le rôle des capacités métalinguistiques et de la compétence langagière orale dans l’apprentissage de la lecture en français langue première & seconde », La revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 2000, 56 (3), pp. 469-95.
ARMBRUSTER Bonnie B., “Considerate texts.” In D. Lapp, J. Flood & N. Farman, Content Area Reading and Learning: Instructional Strategies, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2004, pp. 47- 59.
ARMBRUSTER Bonnie B., Anderson Thomas H. & OSTERTAG Joyce, “Does text structure / summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text?” Reading research Quarterly, 1987, 22 (4), pp. 331-346.
ARMBRUSTER Bonnie B., LEHR Fran & OSBORN Jean., Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read kindergarten through grade three, Washington, DC: The U.S. Department of Education, 2001.
BAKER Linda, “Metacognition in Comprehension Instruction.” In C. C. Block, and M. Pressley (Eds.). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (New York: Guilford Press, 2002, pp. 77 – 95.
BAKKEN Jeffrey P. & WHEDON Craig K.,“Teaching text structure to improve reading comprehension.” Intervention in School and Clinic. 2002,37(4), pp. 229-233.
BARRY Arlene L., “Reading strategies teachers say they use”, Journal of Adolescent &Adult literacy, 2002, 46 (2), pp. 132–141.
BAUMANN James E, HOFFMAN James V., DUFFY-HESTER Ann M. & RO Jennifer Moon “The First R Yesterday and Today: U.S. Elementary Reading Instruction Practices Reported by Teachers and Administrators.” Reading Research Quarterly, 2000, 35(3), pp. 338–377.
BEAN Thomas W., “Making Reading Relevant for Adolescents.”In R. D. Robinson (Ed.). Readings in reading instruction. Its history, theory, and development, 2005, pp.263 – 268, Boston: Pearson.
BERNHARDT Elizabeth, B., “Second - Language Reading as a Case Study of Reading Scholarship in the 20th Century.” In M. L. Kamil. & al., Handbook of reading research Lawrence Erlbbaum Associates, 2000, pp.791-811.
BLACHOWICZ Camille L. Z. & FISHER Peter J.,“Vocabulary instruction.” In Barr, R., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P. S. and Kamil, M. (Eds.) Handbook of Reading Research,Volume III. White Plains, Longman, 2000.
BLOCK Cathy Collins, GAMBRELL Linda B. & PRESSLEY Michael, “Preface”. In C.C. Block, L. B. Gambrell and M. Pressley (Eds). Improving Comprehension Instruction: Rethinking Research, Theory, and Classroom Practice (xv-xx), San Francisco,Jossey-Bass, 2002.
BRASELTON Stephania, “Using graphic organizers to improve the reading of mathematics.” In T. Rasinski. & al., Teaching Comprehension and Exploring Multiple Literacies. Newark, DE: IRA, 2000, pp. 47 – 55.
BROWN Rachel, PRESSLEY Michael, VAN METER Peggy, SCHUDER Ted, “A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second grade readers.”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 1996, 88, pp.18–37.
BRAYAN Jan, K-W-W-L: “Questioning the known.”, The Reading Teacher,1998, 51(7), pp. 618-620.
BURT Miriam, PEYTON Kreeft & VAN DUZER Carol., “How should adult ESL reading instruction differ from ABE reading instruction?” CAELA Brief. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics, 2017. (Retrieved October 19, 2017 from: (www.cal.org/caela/esl_resources/briefs/readingdif.html)
CAMPAN Carolyn M. & KING Rita S.,Differentiated Instructional Strategies for reading in Content Area. Thousand Oaks. Corwin Press, Inc, 2003.
CARR Eileen & OGLE Donna, KWL Plus: “A strategy for comprehension and summarization”. Journal of Reading, 1987, 30 (7), pp. 626-631.
CHAMBLISS Marilyn. J., “The Characteristics of Well-Designed Science Textbooks.” In J. Otero, J.A. León, & A.C. Graesser (Eds). The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2002, pp. 51-72.
CORNAIRE Claudette, « Mémoire et stratégies d’apprentissage. » In (Eds.) C. Cornaire & P. M. Raymond, Regard sur la didactique des langues secondes, Outremont, Québec, éditions Logiques. 2001, pp.71-101.
DELLICARPINI Margo, "The role of phonemic awareness in early L2 reading for adult English language learners: Pedagogical implications”. Applied Linguistics Review, 2011, 2, pp. 241-263.
DEWITZ Peter, LEAHY Susan B., JONES Jennifer & SULLIVAN Pamela Maslin, The essential guide to selecting and using core reading programs. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 2010.
DICKSON Shirley V., SIMMONS Deborah C. & KAME’ENUI Edward J., “Text organization: Research bases.” In D. C. Simmons & E. J. Kame’enui (Eds), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1998, pp. 239-278.
DOUVILLE Patricia,“It’s like a video camera in my head”Reading and multi-sensory imaging within a constructivist framework.” Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Orlando, FL, 1999.
DUFFY Gerald G., “The Case for Direct Explanation of Strategies.” In C. C. Block, and M. Pressley (éds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices, New York, Guilford Press,2002,pp.28 –39.
DUKE Nell K. & PEARSON P. David, “Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension.” In Alan E. Farstrup and S. Jay Samuels (Eds.), What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction?, Newark, DE: International Reading Association, Inc. 2002, 3rd ed., pp. 205–242.
DURKIN Dolores, “What Classeroom Observations reveal about Reading Comprehension Instruction.” Reading Research Quarterly. XIV, 1978-1979, 4, pp. 481-534.
EHRI Linnea C. & NUNES, Simone R., “The Role of Phonemic Awareness in Learning to Read.” In Alan E. Farstrup and S. Jay Samuels (Eds.), What Research Has to Say AboutReading Instruction Newark, DE: International Reading Association, Inc. 2002, 3rd ed., pp. 110–139.
ESKEY David E., “Reading in a second language.” In E. Hinkel, Ed., Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2005, pp.563-580.
FOLSE Keith S., Vocabulary myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 2004.
FUKKINK Ruben G., HULSTIJN, Jan & SIMIS Annegien, “Does training in second-language word recognition skills affect reading comprehension? An experimental study.” Modern Language Journal,2005, 89, pp. 54-75.
GOLDMAN Susan R. & RAKESTRAW, John A., “Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text.” In M.L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000, Vol. II, pp. 311-335.
GRABE William, “Research on teaching reading.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, 2004, 24, pp. 44-69.
GRABE William, “Current Developments in Second Language Reading Research.” TESOL Quarterly, 1991, 25 (3), pp. 375 – 406.
GRAVES Michael F. & WATTS-TAFFE Susan M., “The Place of Word Consciousness in a Research-Based Vocabulary Program.” In Alan E. Farstrup and S. Jay Samuels (Eds.), What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction?, Newark, DE: International Reading Association, Inc, 2002, 3rd ed., pp. 140–165
GUTHERIE John T., “Classroom context for Engaged Reading: an Overview.” In J. T. Gutherie, A. Wigfild & K. C. Perencevich: Motivating Reading comprehension: Concept –Oriented Reading Instruction, Mahwah Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 2004, pp. 1-24.
GUTHERIE John T., ANDERSON Emily, ALAO Solomon & RINEHART Jennifer, “Influences of Concept- Oriented Reading Instruction on strategy use and conceptual learning from text." Elementary School Journal, 1999, 99(4), 343-366.
HARVEY Stephanie & GOUDVIS Anne, Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. Portland, ME: Stenhouse, 2000.
HERRELL Adrienne L., Fifty strategies for teaching English Language Learners. Upper Saddle Rover, NJ, Merrill, 2002.
HWANG Yooyeun & LEVIN Joel R., “Examination of middle-school students’ independent use of a complex mnemonic system.” The Journal of Experimental Education, 2002, 71(1),25 – 38.
JACOBSON Jennifer & RAYMER Dottie, Graphic Organizers: 50 Great Templates to help kidsget more out of reading, writing, social studies & more, New York. Scholastic Professional Books, 1999.
JANZEN Joy, “Strategic reading on a sustained content theme.” In J. Murphy& P. Byrd (Eds.), Understanding the courses we teach: Local perspectives on English language teaching, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2001, pp. 369-389
JITENDRA Asha K, EDWARDS Lana L, SACKS Gabriell & JACOBSON Lisa A, “What Research Says about Vocabulary Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities?” Exceptional Children.2004, 70 (3), 299-322.
JUEL Connie & MINDEN-CUPP Cecilia, “Learning to Read Words: Linguistic Units and Instructional Strategies.” In R. B. Rudell and N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theor&ical Models and Processes of Reading Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 2004, pp.313 -365.
KEENE Ellin Oliver, ZIMMERMANN Susan & NEWKIRK Thomas, Mosaic of thought: Teaching comprehension in a reader’s workshop. Portsmouth, NH, Heinemann, 1997.
KERN Richard G., “Teaching Second Language Texts: Schematic Interaction, Affective Response and the Directed Reading-Thinking Activity.” The Canadian Modern Language Review, 1992, 48 (2), pp. 307-325.
KINTSCH Walter, Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
KLEINHEKSEL Karen A, & SUMMY Sarah, E., “Enhancing Student Learning and Social Behavior through Mnemonic Strategies.” TEACHING Exceptional Children. 2003, 36 (2) 30-35.
KLINGNER Janette Kettmann & VAUGHN Sharon, “Using Collaborative Strategic Reading.” Teaching Exceptional Children, 1998, 30 (6), pp. 32-37.
KLINGNER Janette Kettmann & VAUGHN Sharon “Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second language.” The Elementary School Journal, 1996, 96 (3), 275-293.
KUHN Melanie R. & STAHL Steven A., “A Review of Developmental and Remedial Practices.” In R. B. Rudell and N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 2004, pp.412 – 453.
KRUIDENIER John, Research-based principles for Adult Basic Education reading instruction.Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy, 2002.
MARTEL Virginie, LÉVESQUE, Jean-Yves & AUBIN-HORTH, Shanoussa, “Compréhension en lecture au primaire : actualisation des pratiques enseignantes.», Nouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation, 2012, 15, pp. 87–106.
Lenski Susan Davis, WHAM Mary Ann& JOHNS Jerry L., Reading and learning strategies for middle and high school students. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt, 1999.
MANDEVILLE Thomas F., K-W-LA: “Linking the affective and cognitive domains.” The reading teacher, 1999, 47 (8), pp. 679-80.
MASTROPIERI Margo A. & SCRUGGS Thomas E., “Enhancing School Success with Mnemonic Strategies.” Intervention in School and Clinic, 1998, 33, 201–208.
MCLAIN K. Victoria Mayer, “Effects of two comprehension monitoring strategies on the metacognitive awareness and reading achievement of third and fifth grade students”, 1993, (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 364 840, Retrieved October 19, 2017 (From https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED364840)
MILLER Debbie, Reading with meaning: Teaching comprehension in the primary grades. Portland, ME: Stenhouse, 2002.
MILLER Debbie & GOUDVIS Anne, “Classroom conversations: Young children discuss fairness and justice, intolerance and prejudice.” In J. Robertson (Ed.), Teaching for a Tolerant World. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English, 1999, pp.219-239.
NATION, I. S. Paul., “Teaching and learning vocabulary.” In E. Hinkel, Ed., Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2005, pp.581-595.
NATIONAL READING PANEL (NRP). , Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and US. Department of Education, 2000.
OGLE Donna M., K-W-L: “A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text.” Reading Teacher, 1986, 39 (6), 564-570.
OLSON, M. W. & DISHNER, E. K., “Content Area Reading: a historical Perspective.” In D. Lapp, J. Flood, N. Farman. Content Area Reading and Learning: Instructional Strategies, Boston. Allyn and Bacon, 2004, pp.1- 14.
PARDO Laura S., “What every teacher needs to know about comprehension.” The Reading Teacher, 2004, 58 (3), pp. 272 – 280.
PEARSON P. David, “Changing the Face of Reading Comprehension Instruction.” In R. D. Robinson (Ed.). Readings in reading instruction. Its history, theory, and development. Boston. Pearson, 2005, pp. 100 – 113.
PEARSON P. David & CAMPERELL Kaybeth, “Comprehension of Text Structures.” In R. B. Rudell. and N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading Newark, DE: International Reading Association, (Supplementary Articles: 2.9), Fifth Edition, 2004.
PRESSLEY Michael, “Metacognition and Self-Regulated Comprehension.” In Alan E. Farstrup and S. Jay Samuels (Eds.), What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction? Newark, DE: International Reading Association, Inc,2002 a, 3rd ed., pp.291-309.
PRESSLEY Michael, “Improving Comprehension Instruction: A Path for the Future.” In C. C. Block, L. B. Gambrell and M. Pressley (Eds), ImprovingComprehension Instruction: Rethinking Research, Theory, and Classroom Practice, San Francisco. Jossey-Bass, 2002 b, pp.385 -399.
PROTHEROE Nancy, “Helping Struggling Readers.” In R. D. Robinson (Ed.), Readings in reading instruction. Its history, theory, and development. Boston. Pearson, 2005, pp. 218 – 220.
PROCTOR C. Patrick, CARLO Maria, AUGUST Diane & SNOW Catherine, “Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005, 97, pp. 246-256.
REED Deborah, “Motivating Students to Read.” SEDL Letter. XVII (1), 2005,pp.14- 17.
RICHARDS Jack C. & RODGERS Theodore S., Approaches and methods in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
RUDDELL Martha Rapp, Teaching Content Reading and Writing, (Third Edition), John Wiley & Sons New York, 2001.
SALATACI Reyhan & AKYEL Ayse, “Possible Effects of Strategy Instruction on L1 and L2 Reading.” Reading in a Foreign Language. V. 14, N.1 (Retrieved October 10, 2017 from: http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April 2002/salataci/salataci.html)
SAMMUELS S. Jay, “Reading Fluency: Its Development and Assessment.” In Alan E. Farstrup and S. Jay Samuels (Eds.), What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction, Newark, DE: International Reading Association, Inc, 2002, 3rd ed., pp.166 -183.
SCHMIDT Patricia Ruggiano, KWLQ: “Inquiry and Literacy Learning in Science.” The Reading Teacher, 1999, 52(6), pp.789-792.
SHARP Alastair, Reading Comprehension and Text Organization. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2003.
SHANAHAN Timothy & NEUMAN Susan B., “Literacay Reasearch That Makes a Differences.” In R. D. Robinson (Ed.). Readings in reading instruction. Its history, theory, and development. Boston. Pearson, 2005, pp. 24 - 35.
SINGER Harry, “Theor&ical Models of Reading: Implications for Teaching and Research.” In R. B. Rudell and N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 2004, (Supplementary Articles: 3.6). Fifth Edition.
SINATRA Gale M., BROWN Kathleen J. & REYNOLDS Ralph E., “Implications of cognitive resource allocation for comprehension strategies instruction.” In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices, New York: Guilford Press, 2002, pp.62-76.
SIPPOLA Arne E., “KWLS.” The Reading Teacher, 1995, 48 (6), pp. 542-543.
SMOLKIN Laura B. & DONOVAN Carol A., “Oh, excellent, excellent question!” Developmental differences and comprehension acquisition. In C.C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices, New York: Guilford Press, 2002, pp. 140 -157.
STONE Nancy & MILLER Karen, “Developmental college reading: Secrets of our success.” Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 1991, 7(2), pp. 27-42.
STUART Morag, "Getting Ready for Reading: A Follow-up Study of Inner City Second Language Learners at the End of Key Stage 1.” British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2004, 74 (1), pp. 15-36.
SWAN Emily Anderson, Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction: Engaging Classrooms, Lifelong Learners. Emily Anderson Swan. New York: The Guilford Press, 2003.
SWANSON H. Lee, Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: The Guilford Press, 1999,
SWEET Anne P. & SNOW Catherine, “Reconceptualizing Reading Comprehension. In C.C. Block, L. B. Gambrell and M. Pressley” (Eds) Improving Comprehension Instruction: Rethinking Research, Theory, and Classroom Practice (17 - 53). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002, pp.17 35.
TAGUCHI Etsuo, TAKAYASU-MAASS Miyoko & GORSUCH Greta J., “Developing Reading Fluency in EFL: How Assisted Repeated Reading and Extensive Reading Affect Fluency Development.” Reading in a Foreign Language, 2004, 16 (2), pp. 70-96.
TAN Annette & NICHOLSON Tom,“Flashcards Revisited: Training Poor Readers To Read Words Faster Improves Their Comprehension of Text.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1997, 89 (2), pp. 267-288.
TAYLOR Barbara M., PEARSON P. David, PETERSON Debra S. & RODRIQUEZ Michael C., “Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning.” Elementary School Journal, 2003, 104(1), pp. 3-30.
TAYLOR Barbara M., PETERSON, Debra S., PEARSON P. David & RODRIQUEZ Michael C.,” Looking inside classrooms: Reflecting on the "how" as well as the "what" in effective reading instruction.” The Reading Teacher, 2002 a, 56 (3), pp. 270 - 279.
TAYLOR Barbara M., PEARSON P. David, CLARK Kathleen & WALPOLE Sharon, “Effective schools and accomplished teachers: Lessons about primary-grade reading instruction in low-income schools.” In B. M. Taylor & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Teaching reading: Effective schools, accomplished teachers, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002 b, (pp. 3-72).
TOMPKINS Gail. E., Literacy for the 21st Century: A Balanced Approach . Upper Saddle River. Prentice Hall, 2001.
TRABASSO Tom & BOUCHARD Edward, “Teaching readers how to comprehend text strategically.” In C. Block and M. Pressley, (Eds.) Comprehension instruction: Research-based practices, NY: Guilford Press, 2002, pp. 176- 200.
UBERTI Heather Zrebiec, SCRUGGS Thomas F., & MASTROPIERI Margo A., “Keywords make the difference! Mnemonic instruction in inclusive classrooms.” Teaching Exceptional Children, 2003, 10 (3),56–61.
UPTON Thomas A., Reading skills for Success: A Guide to Academic Texts. Michigan. University of Michigan, 2004.
VACCA Richard T. & VACCA Jo Anne L., Content Area Reading: Literacy and Learning across the Curriculum. New York: Longman, 2002.
VILLAUME Susan Kidd & BRABHAM Edna Greene, “Comprehension Instruction: Beyond Strategies.” In R. D. Robinson (Ed.). Readings in reading instruction. Its history, theory, and development. Boston. Pearson, 2005, pp. 113 - 119.
WALLACE Catherine, “Reading. In Carter, R. & Nunan, D”, (eds) Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 21 - 27.
WILLIAMS Joanna P., “Reading Comprehension Strategies and Teacher Preparation. In Alan E. Farstrup and S. Jay Samuels” (Eds.), What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction?, Newark, DE: International Reading Association, Inc, 2002, 3rd ed., pp. 243–260.
WILLOUGHBY Teena, DESMARAIS Serge, WOOD Eileen, SIMS Suzanne & KARLA Michelle,”Mechanisms that facilitate the effectiveness of elaboration strategies.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 1997, 89, pp. 682-685.
WREN Sebastian & REED Deborah, “Literacy Coaches: Roles and Responsibilities”, SEDL Letter. XVII (1), 2005, pp.6-13.
YOSHIKAWA Lisa & YAMASHITA Junko, Phonemic Awareness and Reading Comprehension among Japanese Adult Learners of English. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 2014, 4, pp. 471-480.
)